A settlement being discussed in an antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA and major college conferences could cost billions and pave the way for a compensation model for college athletes.
An agreement has not been finalized and many questions remain unanswered. It is also unclear if new rules could withstand further legal scrutiny, but it appears college sports is heading down a revolutionary path with at least some schools directly paying athletes to participate. Here’s what is known and what still needs to be figured out:
House vs. NCAA is a class-action federal lawsuit seeking damages for athletes who were denied the opportunity to earn money from use of their name, image or likeness going back to 2016. The plaintiffs, including former Arizona State swimmer Grant House, are also asking the court to rule that NIL compensation should include billions of dollars in media rights fees that go to the NCAA and the wealthiest conferences (Big Ten, Big 12, Atlantic Coast and Southeastern), mostly for football and basketball.
Related articles:
Related suggestion:
Pregnant Lea Michele shows off her baby bump in cropped sweater and leggings for walk with 3WWE respond to Hollywood report trashing The Rock's onAP Week in Pictures: Latin America and CaribbeanAP Week in Pictures: GlobalIndianapolis police fatally shoot male who pointed a weapon at others and threatened themHalle Berry shouts from the Capitol, 'I'm in menopause' as she seeks to end a stigmaEmily Ratajkowski displays her cleavage and backside as she dons thong in VERY sexy shootChurchill Downs unveils new $200 million paddock ahead of the 150th Kentucky DerbyThe LatestUniversities take steps to prevent pro
0.1871s , 5050.3671875 kb
Copyright © 2024 Powered by Paying college athletes appears closer than ever. How could it work and what stands in the way? ,Stellar Stance news portal